Sunday 10 March 2013

Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,351,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1998 at a price of $12,457,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answer to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16))

Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,351,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1998 at a price of $12,457,500.

  

What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answer to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16))



CLICK HERE TO GET THE ANSWER !!!!

No comments:

Post a Comment